Blog > SEC Enforcement Action Against Two Sigma: Lessons in Compliance and Technology Risks

SEC Enforcement Action Against Two Sigma: Lessons in Compliance and Technology Risks

Navigating compliance: lessons from Two Sigma’s SEC settlement
Two Sigma

Did you enjoy this post? Share it with your network to spread these insider tips! Click a social icon and tag us @ArootahCoach

Earlier this year, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took significant enforcement action against Two Sigma, a well-known New York-based investment adviser that manages over $60 billion in assets. The hefty, settled charges included a $90 million penalty and $165 million in restitution to impacted clients. This enforcement underscores significant compliance failures within Two Sigma’s management of proprietary investment models, particularly in addressing known vulnerabilities and maintaining rigorous oversight amidst integrating advanced technologies in the financial sector.

The Background and Charges

The SEC’s investigation revealed that Two Sigma had failed to address critical security vulnerabilities in its algorithmic models for over four years. Initial concerns emerged as early as March 2019 after employees at Two Sigma identified significant vulnerabilities that allowed unrestricted access to modify live-trading algorithmic models without necessary approvals or appropriate oversight. Despite internal warnings, including a serious alert from a senior engineer in January 2022 about the risky access privileges, Two Sigma delayed implementing comprehensive measures until much later, leading to significant financial disparities across client accounts.

In May 2022, an employee accidentally altered model parameters, highlighting the urgent need for improved controls and showing how serious the risks were. In June 2022, limited access controls were implemented but proved insufficient to fully mitigate risks. Despite this awareness, the lack of timely response and continued oversight led to several incidents where unauthorized changes significantly affected client returns.

Between November 2021 and August 2023, unauthorized modifications to 14 models resulted in some funds overperforming by $400 million and others underperforming by $165 million. This disparity led to uneven returns across client accounts and improperly inflated compensation for the modeler responsible. Two Sigma delayed fully addressing these vulnerabilities until August 2023, which the SEC deemed an unreasonable response.

Get the latest news and leadership insights for alternative investment industry and family office professionals. Sign up for The Capital Return newsletter today.

By providing your email address, you agree to receive email communication from Arootah

Systemic Issues and Regulatory Implications

The SEC’s enforcement also highlighted failures beyond just the delayed response. Two Sigma was found lacking in the ability to establish adequate written policies and procedures to manage these identified risks. Moreover, the firm failed to appropriately supervise an employee who made unauthorized alterations to more than a dozen models, leading to decisions that deviated from clients’ expected investment strategies. The SEC also emphasized that the firm’s transition from a secure system to a less restricted CelFS database facilitated numerous employees’ unrestricted access, exacerbating the risk when fixes were delayed. Despite proposals for tighter controls, encrypting model parameters, and using alternative databases, organizational indecision led to prolonged vulnerabilities. Additionally, Two Sigma faced charges for violating the SEC’s whistleblower protection rule by including clauses in separation agreements that potentially could identify and penalize whistleblowers.

Two Sigma has faced past regulatory issues, such as a $25,000 fine by the Chicago Board of Trade in March 2017 for position limit violations, which indicate a pattern of oversight challenges. The substantial increase in the penalty for the 2025 action signals the SEC’s view of these violations as indicative of deeper systemic problems within Two Sigma’s risk management practices rather than isolated incidents.

The enforcement action not only imposed financial penalties but also spotlighted the broader ethical and fiduciary implications of Two Sigma’s conduct. The significant time lag in addressing known risks breached the firm’s fiduciary duty to protect client interests and minimize operational risks. This breach was exacerbated by a compensation structure that incentivized overperformance, potentially at the expense of client interests, leading to millions in additional compensation for the responsible modeler based on manipulated performance metrics.

Balancing Innovation with Risk Management

The SEC’s enforcement action against Two Sigma serves as a critical reminder of the complexities investment firms face as they integrate advanced technologies into their operations. As we move further into an era dominated by machine learning and AI, it’s crucial to recognize that while these technologies can significantly boost market performance and operational efficiencies, they also introduce unique risks. Therefore, a sophisticated approach to risk management is essential to navigate these complexities effectively.

Enhancing Security and Oversight in Algorithmic Trading

Effective access controls are crucial in clearly separating development, testing, and production environments within algorithmic trading frameworks. The Two Sigma case illustrates the severe consequences of inadequate controls, ranging from accidental errors to deliberate manipulations, all of which can compromise the integrity of trading operations. Implementing stringent access controls not only helps prevent such mishaps but also fortifies the security of trading systems.

The lack of prompt and effective monitoring systems at Two Sigma led to unauthorized alterations going undetected, thereby endangering investment security and breaching fiduciary duties. Investment firms must have advanced monitoring systems capable of detecting any unauthorized changes in real-time. Furthermore, firms must establish clear protocols for managing and mitigating risks, ensuring that all operational activities align with legal and ethical standards.

Recommendations for Investment Managers

Investment managers employing quantitative strategies should observe the lessons from Two Sigma’s regulatory scrutiny and bolster their risk management practices. Here are four key recommendations:

  1. Implement Robust Access Controls: Ensure that modifications to critical trading parameters are restricted to authorized personnel only, accompanied by a transparent audit trail of all changes.
  2. Regular Reviews and Updates: Maintain a regime of continuous monitoring and timely review of algorithmic trading models to swiftly identify and rectify any vulnerabilities.
  3. Enhance Supervisory Structures: Develop comprehensive supervisory protocols that mandate multiple levels of approval before any modifications to trading models are made, effectively preventing unauthorized changes.
  4. Cultivate a Culture of Compliance: Promote an organizational culture that emphasizes the importance of compliance and ethical behavior, particularly crucial in managing sophisticated trading models.

By adopting these strategies, investment managers can not only safeguard their operations against potential risks but also position their firms to capitalize on the opportunities presented by advanced technological innovations. This proactive approach is crucial in maintaining the integrity and competitiveness of their investment strategies in the dynamic landscape of financial markets.

The Bottom Line

The SEC’s enforcement action against Two Sigma highlights the essential role of comprehensive compliance protocols in the realm of quantitative trading and broader technological deployments within the investment management sector. As the reliance on cutting-edge technologies expands, the need to uphold a rigorous compliance framework grows as well. This framework is vital not only for safeguarding client assets but also for preserving the overall integrity of the financial markets.

The significant financial and reputational damages sustained by Two Sigma highlights the severe consequences of compliance lapses, serving as a catalyst for industry-wide enhancements in risk management strategies. This enforcement action should encourage all investment managers to critically assess and enhance their operational policies, ensuring their practices align with the highest standards of regulatory compliance and ethical conduct.

Contact Arootah today to learn more about our tailored advisory services and take the next step toward peak performance.

Get the latest news and leadership insights for alternative investment industry and family office professionals. Sign up for The Capital Return newsletter today.

By providing your email address, you agree to receive email communication from Arootah

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, investment, financial, accounting, or tax advice, or establish an attorney-client relationship. Arootah does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or suitability of its content for a particular purpose. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read in our newsletter, blog, or anywhere else on our website.

What are your thoughts?

Leave a comment with your thoughts, questions, compliments, and frustrations. We love to socialize in a constructive, positive way.

Are You Human?

 
Please verify.
Validation complete 🙂
Validation failed 🙁
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments